the US, rating agency Moody’s Investors Service, in a review of the
industry’s prospects, has declared the country’s life insurers to
be in good shape. However, despite the life industry being awarded
a stable outlook for 2008, some pertinent caveats are included by
the author of the industry outlook, Laura Bazer, a Moody’s
vice-president and senior credit officer.
From a positive perspective, Moody’s believes that the impact of
residential mortgage subprime-related asset write-downs on the US
life insurance industry should be limited and that investment
portfolios, for the most part, should emerge without significant
damage. According to a study published by Moody’s in June 2007,
subprime loans comprise less than 12 percent of the life industry’s
total risk-in-force.
“Excellent capital adequacy and good financial flexibility also
support the industry’s continuing good health,“ said Bazer. She
predicted that the life insurance industry’s earnings “will most
likely remain robust for 2007 results, as well as in 2008”.
Diversified industry
Moody’s also stressed that the US life insurance industry remained
well diversified in 2006 and 2007, in terms of business mix,
earnings and product risk.
“Importantly, most of the industry’s largest, leading players had
at least three or four distinct lines of business, including older
blocks of traditional life insurance policies, which should provide
a stable stream of earnings for many years to come,” said Bazer.
“We believe the industry’s business diversification continues to be
a key strength, cushioning its earnings from shocks to a particular
product or market.”

US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?
Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.
By GlobalDataFavourable market conditions in recent years have been marked by a
sharp decline in the number of insurers in Moody’s rating universe
subject to downgrades of their long-term financial strength
ratings. Notably, of all re-ratings between 2004 and 2007, five
were downgrades and 12 were upgrades. As at 31 December 2007, 83
percent of insurers rated by Moody’s were regarded as having a
“stable” outlook, 7 percent a “positive” outlook and 7 percent a
“negative” outlook, while 3 percent were under review for up- or
downgrades.
The US life insurance industry has on average been assigned an A1
long-term insurance financial strength rating by Moody’s. A1 is the
fifth highest of the rating agency’s investment grade ratings, the
highest being Aaa, a status enjoyed by two US insurers, New York
Life and the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association.
Necessary developments
Moody’s highlighted two developments that would be required to
result in an upgrade of the US life insurance industry’s average
rating. Both are of a long-term nature.
The first, explained Bazer, would require consistent improvement in
risk-adjusted profitability on new business over the long term and
would likely require greater pricing discipline and significant
additional industry consolidation. The second would require a net
reduction in product risk resulting from, for example, more
effective product design, distribution management and hedging. The
use of capital markets solutions to offload risk could provide a
viable solution over the long term, said Bazer.
Bazer also pointed to factors that could put downward pressure on
the life industry’s rating:
- a sharp decline in sales and premiums, driven by an economic
slowdown/recession and low interest rates, particularly affecting
investment and savings products, such as individual annuities,
institutional investment products and pensions. This was a
possibility if current economic indicators continue to turn
negative, said Bazer; - deteriorating asset quality, resulting in unexpectedly high
write-downs, realised and unrealised losses similar to levels
experienced between 2001 and 2003; and - a significant equity market downturn – depressing revenues,
earnings and capital as well as hindering financial flexibility –
accompanied by reduced availability of capital markets financing
solutions because of continued credit market disruption. This has a
moderate probability of occurring should the current market
disruption continue and if the economy experiences a recession,
said Bazer.Overall, Bazer said Moody’s believes that the solid performance of
the life industry over the past few years has benefited from a
strong economy, reasonably stable and favourable equity market, and
a very benign credit market. “We see unstable capital market and
economic conditions potentially pressuring companies’ investment
portfolios and operating results if the current situation worsens
and/or continues for a prolonged period,” said Bazer.Greater risk
Bazer also emphasised that life insurers’ products have become
increasingly complex in recent years, with product features
affording what she termed “greater optionality” to policyholders,
resulting in greater risk to insurers. “Greater product optionality
weakens the credit profile of life insurers, to the extent that it
puts the decision-making about if and when to exercise the option
in the hands of policyholders – a risk that, to date, life insurers
have had uncertainty in quantifying, pricing for and managing,”
said Bazer.In this context, she continued, key risks faced by insurers
are: - equity market risk, which affect variable annuity performance,
assets under management and sales; - interest rate risk, which impacts on spreads on fixed rate
products such as fixed annuities, traditional life insurance and
structured settlement annuities; and - rollover and reinvestment risk, which can affect institutional
investment products, such as funding agreement-backed notes and
guaranteed interest contracts.In addition, said Bazer, the now-ubiquitous benefit guarantees such
as death, income and withdrawal benefits on variable annuities, and
premium guarantees on certain term and universal life policies,
create pricing and profit uncertainties, as they place increasingly
valuable options in the hands of policyholders who may be influenced by their distributors and/or
independent third parties for longer periods of time.She added that new products introduced in 2006 and 2007 offered
policyholders even greater optionality, in terms of liquidity
(annuities with guaranteed stop-and-start withdrawal and
accumulation benefits) and longevity protection with an equity
component (guaranteed variable immediate annuities).Bazer also noted that markets for many of the new annuity and life
insurance products are volume driven and often exhibit intense
competition and a lack of pricing discipline, something that holds
particularly true for products sold in the brokerage producer
channel.Role of equity market
The key role played by the equity market in the fortunes of US life
insurers is of significance in the light of both current equity
market volatility and a decline of about 15 percent in the US
S&P500 equity index since October 2007. Indeed, Bazer noted:
“Behind the industry’s recent profitability, of course, has been a
rising equity market – at least until the second half of
2007.”Moody’s pointed out that about 40 percent of the life industry’s
total assets now support equity-based products, resulting in life
insurers’ profitability becoming increasingly linked with the
health of the equity market. According to Moody’s, the equity
market has appreciated by about 14 percent a year since its last
major cyclical low in September 2002. Since that time, said Bazer,
generally robust and rising equity market values have boosted
industry sales of variable annuities, pension annuities, variable
life insurance and mutual funds, and buoyed assets under management
and related fees.A well-conceived hedging programme can provide insurers with needed
protection in a down equity market, said Bazer. However, she added:
“The extent of that protection in the next bear market is still
open to question. Moreover, time will tell if insurers that
dynamically hedge have been whipsawed getting in and out of hedge
positions [at the wrong time] in today’s extremely volatile equity
market conditions.”